Jump to main navigation. Jump to main content

The CURA publications library is currently being digitized by the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. When the project is complete, the entire CURA publications library will be online and fully searchable. Unfortunately, during this process we are not able to honor individual requests for publications . Additionally, we no longer have physical copies of publications to send out.

New publications are digitized daily and the publications catalog on the CURA website is not automatically updated with links to scanned copies, so please search the CURA collection at the Digital Conservancy for the publications you are looking for:

A Review of Local Wage Theft Ordinances, Data Practices, & Evaluation Procedures

Author: 
Cowgill, Jonathan

The phenomenon of wage theft, where employers fail to compensate their employees with the wages due them, is widespread in the United States. The National Employment Law Project (NELP) has estimated the amount of wages stolen in the United States to be tens of millions of dollars per year (Winning Wage Justice, 2011), and a 2008 survey of workers in Chicago, Los Angeles and New York found that 68% of those surveyed had experienced at least one pay-related violation during the past week of work (RISEP, 2013). While it is technically illegal to deprive an employee of the wages due her, retrieving stolen wages can be a long and convoluted process in many jurisdictions. Traditional conciliation court proceedings sometimes do little to deter the perpetrating employer from offending again. This report provides an outline of how current wage theft policies operate, and in doing so explored the pros and cons of different local (municipal and county-level) approaches to the problem.

In recent years, state and municipal governments have passed legislation to strengthen wage theft laws. These laws operate in different ways. Some place heavy fines or permit sanctions on businesses found in violation, and some create a simpler process for victims to recoup stolen wages. Others institute new requirements during the hiring process, and still others legislate new reporting requirements for businesses. In some municipalities more than one of these approaches is used at once. The political viability of each of these approaches varies from state to state and city to city.

Journal: 
KNCBR
Publication date: 
2016
Publisher: 
Unpublished
Sponsor: 
Conducted on behalf of Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en Lucha. Supported by the Kris Nelson Community-Based Research Program, a program of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA) at the University of Minnesota.
Pages: 
12
Online availability
CURA call number: 
KNCBR-1409